求《蝴蝶效应》的英文影评

发布网友发布时间：2022-05-26 06:56

共3个回答

热心网友时间：2023-10-03 11:24

　　这部电影，很棒，看完后，一个人，活脱脱地呆住了。

　　有很多片段，他们已经成了记忆的一部分，我们会尽力忘掉这些片段，仅仅是因为我们无法回到那时刻，改变他们。如果给了我这个可能，让我重回旧日十字路口，如果我能在那一刻预先知道了某种选择所带来的我并不愿发生的结果，让我收住脚步，转身向另一个方向迈出一步，我的历史，会不会就此更完美？

　　这部电影，不但假设出这种可能，甚至还试着给出了一个让人意想不到的答案：

　　是的，如果蝴蝶在那个时刻，没有飞走，而仅仅抖动了一下翅膀，在时间的链条的末端，将凭空多出一场飓风，更糟的是，没人知道风是在向哪里吹。

　　当一切都是未知的，我们只能自我安慰似的假定我们所实际经历过并参与改变的世界是迄今为止最好的一种结果，当然，如果你认为那是最糟的会觉得舒服些的话也悉听尊便。有一种假定，也就是影片中所提供的这种假定，可能是我所能想到的最让人沮丧的了一种了，即，无论更改历史上的任何一个环节，都将导致一场无法预料到的灾难，（影片只有两处特例，即主人公为了得到监狱室友的配合，而回到过去，用钉子伤了自己的手，以及为了毁掉历史上的*，而拿起了刀子，这两次过后，主人公都回到了既定的时空，不但没有带来重大的灾难性改变，甚至还为此受益）。假释你有能力看到一个没有自己的世界的美好（正如影片最后三分钟的镜头）换作是谁，都要感到深深的失落。

　　主人公的不幸是家族遗传性的，但这种看似无休无止的不幸终因时代的进步，可以用影像记录下婴儿降生的过程而宣告结束，纵然这个生命没有胎死腹中，料想在他长大*之后，在得知自己的这种能力后，也只有被关进疯人院或者自我了断两条路可走。或许不在这个尘世露面，是他能想到的最好的结局，但，即便这样，仍要有一个母亲为他的早早离去而痛苦不堪。

　　换句话说，如果一个人得到了可以扭转历史的能力，等待他的要么是历史的灾难，要么是自己的悲剧。而有两种动力使拥有此种能力的人的命运成为必然，即，悔恨与贪婪——要么是为自己的曾经做过的事情懊恼不已，要么是就是对正置身其中的生活状态不满，渴望改变，正是这两种情绪使我们不时产生要回到过去改变历史的冲动，也正是这两种情绪让人区别于神。

　　电影中的主人公的所作所为，暗合一个宗教命题，既然我之存在只会为世人带来不幸，那么，我不入地狱谁入地狱？主人公手上的钉痕，隐隐暗示着殉道者式的苦恼。人人都可能在某一刻产生回到过去改变历史的愿望，这是人性导致的必然。然而这个愿望永远无法达成，所以人们才得以以现在的状态与关系存在于世。人们终日忙碌，或幸福，或困苦，他们期待着新的生命的降临，却又对冥冥一无所知，他们只能自我安慰似的为一切拟定一个个答案，一代代恪守着，以期无穷无尽地平安地繁衍下去。

　　人之所以存在，只因人不是神。
　　The film, great, after reading a person look just like to transfixed.

　　There are many fragments, they have become part of the memory, we will try to forget about these clips, just because we can not return to that moment, to change them. If you give me this possibility, let me return to the old crossroads, if I can know in advance that moment brought me a choice and do not want to place the results, I received stopped, turned to another step direction, my history, would not this be more perfect?

　　The film not only out of such assumptions may even try to give an unexpected answer:

　　Yes, if the butterfly in that moment, no fly away, but just shake a bit wings and the end of the chain in time, will be more of a hurricane out of thin air, worse, no one knows where the wind is blowing to.

　　When everything is unknown, we can only console themselves like assumptions we have experienced and participated in the actual change in the world is a result of the best so far, of course, if you think that the worst would feel better if also wish me it. There is an assumption, which is provided in the film that assumption, I might can think of the most frustrating of a kind, and Ji, Wu Lun Genggailishi on any link to cause the Yichang not Yuliao to the disaster, (film only two exceptions, the hero of the match in order to get the prison roommate, while the return to the past, with the nails hurt his hand, and in order to destroy the history of the bomb, but picked up the knife, which After two, the hero went back to the established time and space, not only did not bring a major cataclysmic change, even this benefit). Parole you have the ability to see a better world without their own (as the movie last three minutes of the lens) for as who should feel the loss deeply.

　　The tragic hero is hereditary in nature, but unfortunately the end of this seemingly endless era of progress because you can use video to record the process of baby born to an end, even if this life is not aborted, expect the After he grew up, in that their ability to post this, only to be locked in a lunatic asylum or a self-breaking of two paths. Maybe not in this earthly appearance, is the best he can think of outcomes, but, even so, still have a mother for his early departure painful.

　　In other words, if a person was able to reverse the historical ability to either wait for his disaster in history, or is their tragedy. The two have the capability, power to the fate of the inevitable, namely, regret and greed - either for their own ever done regretting, either of which is the life of the state is actually dissatisfied with desire change, it is these two emotions so that we proce from time to time to back the urge to change history, but also makes it different from the God of the two emotions.

　　The hero of the movie has done covertly a religious proposition, since I brought the existence of only the unfortunate people of the world, then, What happened to the water? Hands nails hero, vaguely suggesting a martyr-like distress. Everyone can proce back in a moment the desire to change history, this is the inevitable human nature. However, this desire can never be reached, so people were able to present the status and relations are known to the world. People busy, or happiness, or hardship, they look forward to the arrival of new life, but knew nothing of the tied to, they could only console themselves one by one like the answer for all the development, generation after generation abide by the order of infinity multiply endlessly down safely.

　　Person exists, because people are not God！
　　希望有帮助

热心网友时间：2023-10-03 11:25

The film deals with troubled childhoods of four kids, two of whom grow up to become Ashton Kutcher and Amy Smart. (Not literally, of course!) Kutcher's lead, has the ability to travel back to his own past for brief moments by reading his childhood journals or in some cases, watching home movies or looking at photos.

His intention upon discovering this gift, is to repair some of the damage that these events have cause to the group, who have sustained several traumas and left them in various states of dis-functionality as alts. But, as the metaphor relating to Chaos Theory states, "Does the flap of a butterfly's wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas?" Philip Merilees: We witness several distinct changes in then present as a result of his tampering and this often results in more pain, in one way or another.

This is a gripping film, with a true sense of itself, philosophy and needs of the narrative to justify its own dower conclusions, and ultimately, Kutcher's final decisions.

The sound design, cinematography general direction are outstanding here, with power use of all the key elements to give us a naturalistic feel, not dis-similar from something that Steven Spielberg might proce.

The Theatrical Cut was good, but this version is superior, with a new and more appropriate ending more in keeping the with the general tone of the film, this should be a true Sci-Fi classic, in the same league as the likes of "Planet Of The Apes", "The Day The Earth Caught Fire" and in to a lesser extent, this being a more widely accepted addition, "Donnie Darko".

热心网友时间：2023-10-03 11:25

Now normally I tend to prefer movies that let the writer/director tell the story that they want to without having to water it down for mass consumption. In this case I have to say that the ending they they were forced to re-shoot for the theatrical release of this movie is a much more emotional, resonant and appropriate ending than the bleak, cold and grotesque finale they had originally planned. On the US DVDs you get the choice of which version to see (foreign editions only have the less compelling director's version)... so North American viewers can make up their own mind about which ending they prefer. I would suggest watching the theatrical cut first... and then check out the director's cut... which would you prefer to think of as the "real" ending?

As for the movie itself... don't be put off by the idea of Ashton Kutcher in the lead role. He does quite a good job in a serious part quite different from his usual TV persona. He plays a college student who, having been plagued by mental blackouts all his life, devotes himself to the study of human memory. Eventually he finds that by re-reading old journal entries he can will himself back in time to experience the events he had blacked out... and even CHANGE THEM using the knowledge that his older self possesses. Unfortunately one small change in the past causes some HUGE ramifications in his present day world. Can't say too much more about the plot without giving away the many fun surprises. Believable performances and a basic seriousness give the film an urgency that is sometimes missing in modern fantasy films of this type