有个电影讲机器人的不知道什么名字有没有谁知道~
发布网友
发布时间：2022-05-01 13:04
共4个回答
热心网友
时间：2023-10-14 00:32
导演：斯蒂文-斯皮尔伯格(Steven Spielberg)
编剧：Ian waston
主演：
海利-乔-奥斯蒙特(Haley Joel Osment)
裘德-洛(Jude Law)
弗朗西斯-奥康娜(Frances O'Connor)
萨姆-罗伯兹(Sam Robards)
类型：科幻片 /冒险
大概剧情：The "literalists" are clearly not happy with A.I. So now is a good time to recall that "2001: A Space Odyssey" was greeted upon release with derision, confusion, dismissive reviews, public consternation, and, oh yeah, some thought it was an absolute masterpiece. Beyond the monolithic influence of that film (think of Han Solo's jump to lightspeed, etc.), the symbols of "2001" -- TO THIS VERY DAY -- cannot be decoded using anything but the most personal, interpretive language. The obelisks, the message of the obelisks, the Star Child, Cosmonaut Dave's "room", HAL-9000's true motivation – all these things remain in our collective subconscious as indelible images that refuse to be concretely defined between or among viewers. WHAT CAUSES THIS CONFLICT OF PERCEPTION? IS IT INTENTIONAL? Again and again, Kubrick's films take us to a No-Man's Land of narrative and moral ambiguity, stranding us, forcing us to make decisions, demanding interpretation (or we can judge the surface, walk away, hate the film). To my perception, Kubrick is the only, true "Brechtian" film director. The device Brecht proposed is "Alienation Effect", or put simply, Leading the audience down two, divergent paths at once. My favorite example is "Barry Lyndon". Being the adventures of a young man, handsome, virtuous, well-meaning, ambitious, full of promise. Yet in every scene, the camera "pulls-back" revealing Barry (but never to himself) to be womanizing, self-absorbed, criminally inclined, socially inept, not very bright, morally bankrupt, and at last, a broken shell of a man. Or let's consider "Strangelove": Did Kubrick really create a headbanger, slapstick comedy about nuclear proliferation, mass destruction, and military/political incompetence? The real question is "Who else could have?" Well, that's my take on Kubrick's artistic sensibility, and, without daring to presume Spielberg's motivation, it's what drew them both to "A.I." Pinocchio, the Blue Fairy, cuddly Teddy Bears on one hand, but on the other hand – social institutions are faltering forever -- parenthood, childhood, science, instry, sexuality -- all distorted beyond repair. And Humans, the ultimate A.I. protagonist, seem blissed-out, in denial, more interested in creating "Davids", "Darlenes" and "Gigolo Joes" than in rising water levels and the imminent threat of extinction. Therefore, I believe A.I. is getting precisely the response all Kubrick films "INITIALLY" get. Spielberg's reputation and career can withstand anything that public perception might bring to his films, but I keep thinking that A.I. is the riskiest moment of his artistic life.
1.21世纪中期，由于气候变暖，南北两极冰盖的融化，地球上很多城市都被淹没在了一片汪洋之中。此时，人类的科学技术已经达到了相当高的水平，人工智能机器人就是人类发明出来的用以应对恶劣自然环境的科技手段之一。
先进的人工智能机器人不但拥有可以乱真的人类外表，而且还能像人类一样感知自己的存在。大卫（海利·乔·奥斯蒙特）就是这样一个有思想、有感情的小机器人，他被一对人类父母所收养，有一个哥哥和一个贴身的伙伴——机器泰德熊。但这些并不能让大卫满足，他一直渴望着自己终有一天不再仅仅是个机器人。抱着对这个愿望的执着，11岁的大卫踏上了漫长的心路历程，跟随在他身边的，还有另一个善良的机器人乔（裘德·洛）。谁也不知道他们能否完成自己的心愿，脱胎换骨成为真正的人，等待他们的只有凶吉难料的对复杂人性的追寻……
2.未来世界缺乏资源，全赖科技主宰一切，服侍一家上下都由机械人代劳。因儿子患重病在雪藏等待治疗期间，一对夫妻收养了一个名叫大卫的机械小男孩，他与众不同之处是因为他是首个在计算机程序注入爱的机械人。当这对夫妇的儿子病愈后，大卫被弃荒野。他深信自己跟普通人无分别，与唯一伴侣机械小熊踏上征途，寻找《木偶奇遇记》幻变生命的女神，遇上机械舞男祖，被大卫感动……
3.这是一个自然资源缺乏，科学技术飞速发展的时代。现代化的住所，精心设计的饮食，为你服务的不再是人类，而是机器人。园艺、家务、友谊，机器人可以满足每一个需求，但“爱”机器人是无法做到的。
在机器人发展过程中，为机器人赋予情感程序极具争议。机器人被看作是现代设备，他们不应具有感情。但是现在由于很多父母没有自己的孩子，所以这种可能性不是没有。
一家计算机公司做出了一个决定：制作一个具有情感的机器人。他的名字叫大卫（哈利·约尔·奥斯曼）——第一个被输入情感程序的机器男孩，作为一个试验品被该公司的员工（山姆·罗伯兹）和他的妻子（弗朗西斯·欧康娜）收养。他们自己的儿子因病被冷冻起来，直到能治疗这种病的方法出现。尽管大卫逐渐溶入这个家庭，但是，一系列意想不到的情况使得大卫对他现在的生活越来越无法忍受。
人类与机器都无法接受他，大卫开始了自己的旅行，寻找真正属于自己的地方……
热心网友
时间：2023-10-14 00:33
华纳兄弟公司(Warner Brothers, USA)2001年出品
主演：
海利-乔-奥斯蒙特(Haley Joel Osment)
裘德-洛(Jude Law)
弗朗西斯-奥康娜(Frances O'Connor)
萨姆-罗伯兹(Sam Robards)
导演：斯蒂文-斯皮尔伯格(Steven Spielberg)
编剧：斯蒂文-斯皮尔伯格(Steven Spielberg)
类型：科幻片
热心网友
时间：2023-10-14 00:32
导演：斯蒂文-斯皮尔伯格(Steven Spielberg)
编剧：Ian waston
主演：
海利-乔-奥斯蒙特(Haley Joel Osment)
裘德-洛(Jude Law)
弗朗西斯-奥康娜(Frances O'Connor)
萨姆-罗伯兹(Sam Robards)
类型：科幻片 /冒险
大概剧情：The "literalists" are clearly not happy with A.I. So now is a good time to recall that "2001: A Space Odyssey" was greeted upon release with derision, confusion, dismissive reviews, public consternation, and, oh yeah, some thought it was an absolute masterpiece. Beyond the monolithic influence of that film (think of Han Solo's jump to lightspeed, etc.), the symbols of "2001" -- TO THIS VERY DAY -- cannot be decoded using anything but the most personal, interpretive language. The obelisks, the message of the obelisks, the Star Child, Cosmonaut Dave's "room", HAL-9000's true motivation – all these things remain in our collective subconscious as indelible images that refuse to be concretely defined between or among viewers. WHAT CAUSES THIS CONFLICT OF PERCEPTION? IS IT INTENTIONAL? Again and again, Kubrick's films take us to a No-Man's Land of narrative and moral ambiguity, stranding us, forcing us to make decisions, demanding interpretation (or we can judge the surface, walk away, hate the film). To my perception, Kubrick is the only, true "Brechtian" film director. The device Brecht proposed is "Alienation Effect", or put simply, Leading the audience down two, divergent paths at once. My favorite example is "Barry Lyndon". Being the adventures of a young man, handsome, virtuous, well-meaning, ambitious, full of promise. Yet in every scene, the camera "pulls-back" revealing Barry (but never to himself) to be womanizing, self-absorbed, criminally inclined, socially inept, not very bright, morally bankrupt, and at last, a broken shell of a man. Or let's consider "Strangelove": Did Kubrick really create a headbanger, slapstick comedy about nuclear proliferation, mass destruction, and military/political incompetence? The real question is "Who else could have?" Well, that's my take on Kubrick's artistic sensibility, and, without daring to presume Spielberg's motivation, it's what drew them both to "A.I." Pinocchio, the Blue Fairy, cuddly Teddy Bears on one hand, but on the other hand – social institutions are faltering forever -- parenthood, childhood, science, instry, sexuality -- all distorted beyond repair. And Humans, the ultimate A.I. protagonist, seem blissed-out, in denial, more interested in creating "Davids", "Darlenes" and "Gigolo Joes" than in rising water levels and the imminent threat of extinction. Therefore, I believe A.I. is getting precisely the response all Kubrick films "INITIALLY" get. Spielberg's reputation and career can withstand anything that public perception might bring to his films, but I keep thinking that A.I. is the riskiest moment of his artistic life.
1.21世纪中期，由于气候变暖，南北两极冰盖的融化，地球上很多城市都被淹没在了一片汪洋之中。此时，人类的科学技术已经达到了相当高的水平，人工智能机器人就是人类发明出来的用以应对恶劣自然环境的科技手段之一。
先进的人工智能机器人不但拥有可以乱真的人类外表，而且还能像人类一样感知自己的存在。大卫（海利·乔·奥斯蒙特）就是这样一个有思想、有感情的小机器人，他被一对人类父母所收养，有一个哥哥和一个贴身的伙伴——机器泰德熊。但这些并不能让大卫满足，他一直渴望着自己终有一天不再仅仅是个机器人。抱着对这个愿望的执着，11岁的大卫踏上了漫长的心路历程，跟随在他身边的，还有另一个善良的机器人乔（裘德·洛）。谁也不知道他们能否完成自己的心愿，脱胎换骨成为真正的人，等待他们的只有凶吉难料的对复杂人性的追寻……
2.未来世界缺乏资源，全赖科技主宰一切，服侍一家上下都由机械人代劳。因儿子患重病在雪藏等待治疗期间，一对夫妻收养了一个名叫大卫的机械小男孩，他与众不同之处是因为他是首个在计算机程序注入爱的机械人。当这对夫妇的儿子病愈后，大卫被弃荒野。他深信自己跟普通人无分别，与唯一伴侣机械小熊踏上征途，寻找《木偶奇遇记》幻变生命的女神，遇上机械舞男祖，被大卫感动……
3.这是一个自然资源缺乏，科学技术飞速发展的时代。现代化的住所，精心设计的饮食，为你服务的不再是人类，而是机器人。园艺、家务、友谊，机器人可以满足每一个需求，但“爱”机器人是无法做到的。
在机器人发展过程中，为机器人赋予情感程序极具争议。机器人被看作是现代设备，他们不应具有感情。但是现在由于很多父母没有自己的孩子，所以这种可能性不是没有。
一家计算机公司做出了一个决定：制作一个具有情感的机器人。他的名字叫大卫（哈利·约尔·奥斯曼）——第一个被输入情感程序的机器男孩，作为一个试验品被该公司的员工（山姆·罗伯兹）和他的妻子（弗朗西斯·欧康娜）收养。他们自己的儿子因病被冷冻起来，直到能治疗这种病的方法出现。尽管大卫逐渐溶入这个家庭，但是，一系列意想不到的情况使得大卫对他现在的生活越来越无法忍受。
人类与机器都无法接受他，大卫开始了自己的旅行，寻找真正属于自己的地方……
热心网友
时间：2023-10-14 00:33
华纳兄弟公司(Warner Brothers, USA)2001年出品
主演：
海利-乔-奥斯蒙特(Haley Joel Osment)
裘德-洛(Jude Law)
弗朗西斯-奥康娜(Frances O'Connor)
萨姆-罗伯兹(Sam Robards)
导演：斯蒂文-斯皮尔伯格(Steven Spielberg)
编剧：斯蒂文-斯皮尔伯格(Steven Spielberg)
类型：科幻片
热心网友
时间：2023-10-14 00:33
很不错的片子,很喜欢.这部片子是斯皮尔伯格拍的,好像是他的一个朋友去世了,为了他拍的这部片子.这个小说就是他的那个朋友写的.
片中的那个男孩海利-乔-奥斯蒙特,演的很出色.
Jude law 演的机器舞男也有点意思...
热心网友
时间：2023-10-14 00:33
很不错的片子,很喜欢.这部片子是斯皮尔伯格拍的,好像是他的一个朋友去世了,为了他拍的这部片子.这个小说就是他的那个朋友写的.
片中的那个男孩海利-乔-奥斯蒙特,演的很出色.
Jude law 演的机器舞男也有点意思...
热心网友
时间：2023-10-14 00:32
导演：斯蒂文-斯皮尔伯格(Steven Spielberg)
编剧：Ian waston
主演：
海利-乔-奥斯蒙特(Haley Joel Osment)
裘德-洛(Jude Law)
弗朗西斯-奥康娜(Frances O'Connor)
萨姆-罗伯兹(Sam Robards)
类型：科幻片 /冒险
大概剧情：The "literalists" are clearly not happy with A.I. So now is a good time to recall that "2001: A Space Odyssey" was greeted upon release with derision, confusion, dismissive reviews, public consternation, and, oh yeah, some thought it was an absolute masterpiece. Beyond the monolithic influence of that film (think of Han Solo's jump to lightspeed, etc.), the symbols of "2001" -- TO THIS VERY DAY -- cannot be decoded using anything but the most personal, interpretive language. The obelisks, the message of the obelisks, the Star Child, Cosmonaut Dave's "room", HAL-9000's true motivation – all these things remain in our collective subconscious as indelible images that refuse to be concretely defined between or among viewers. WHAT CAUSES THIS CONFLICT OF PERCEPTION? IS IT INTENTIONAL? Again and again, Kubrick's films take us to a No-Man's Land of narrative and moral ambiguity, stranding us, forcing us to make decisions, demanding interpretation (or we can judge the surface, walk away, hate the film). To my perception, Kubrick is the only, true "Brechtian" film director. The device Brecht proposed is "Alienation Effect", or put simply, Leading the audience down two, divergent paths at once. My favorite example is "Barry Lyndon". Being the adventures of a young man, handsome, virtuous, well-meaning, ambitious, full of promise. Yet in every scene, the camera "pulls-back" revealing Barry (but never to himself) to be womanizing, self-absorbed, criminally inclined, socially inept, not very bright, morally bankrupt, and at last, a broken shell of a man. Or let's consider "Strangelove": Did Kubrick really create a headbanger, slapstick comedy about nuclear proliferation, mass destruction, and military/political incompetence? The real question is "Who else could have?" Well, that's my take on Kubrick's artistic sensibility, and, without daring to presume Spielberg's motivation, it's what drew them both to "A.I." Pinocchio, the Blue Fairy, cuddly Teddy Bears on one hand, but on the other hand – social institutions are faltering forever -- parenthood, childhood, science, instry, sexuality -- all distorted beyond repair. And Humans, the ultimate A.I. protagonist, seem blissed-out, in denial, more interested in creating "Davids", "Darlenes" and "Gigolo Joes" than in rising water levels and the imminent threat of extinction. Therefore, I believe A.I. is getting precisely the response all Kubrick films "INITIALLY" get. Spielberg's reputation and career can withstand anything that public perception might bring to his films, but I keep thinking that A.I. is the riskiest moment of his artistic life.
1.21世纪中期，由于气候变暖，南北两极冰盖的融化，地球上很多城市都被淹没在了一片汪洋之中。此时，人类的科学技术已经达到了相当高的水平，人工智能机器人就是人类发明出来的用以应对恶劣自然环境的科技手段之一。
先进的人工智能机器人不但拥有可以乱真的人类外表，而且还能像人类一样感知自己的存在。大卫（海利·乔·奥斯蒙特）就是这样一个有思想、有感情的小机器人，他被一对人类父母所收养，有一个哥哥和一个贴身的伙伴——机器泰德熊。但这些并不能让大卫满足，他一直渴望着自己终有一天不再仅仅是个机器人。抱着对这个愿望的执着，11岁的大卫踏上了漫长的心路历程，跟随在他身边的，还有另一个善良的机器人乔（裘德·洛）。谁也不知道他们能否完成自己的心愿，脱胎换骨成为真正的人，等待他们的只有凶吉难料的对复杂人性的追寻……
2.未来世界缺乏资源，全赖科技主宰一切，服侍一家上下都由机械人代劳。因儿子患重病在雪藏等待治疗期间，一对夫妻收养了一个名叫大卫的机械小男孩，他与众不同之处是因为他是首个在计算机程序注入爱的机械人。当这对夫妇的儿子病愈后，大卫被弃荒野。他深信自己跟普通人无分别，与唯一伴侣机械小熊踏上征途，寻找《木偶奇遇记》幻变生命的女神，遇上机械舞男祖，被大卫感动……
3.这是一个自然资源缺乏，科学技术飞速发展的时代。现代化的住所，精心设计的饮食，为你服务的不再是人类，而是机器人。园艺、家务、友谊，机器人可以满足每一个需求，但“爱”机器人是无法做到的。
在机器人发展过程中，为机器人赋予情感程序极具争议。机器人被看作是现代设备，他们不应具有感情。但是现在由于很多父母没有自己的孩子，所以这种可能性不是没有。
一家计算机公司做出了一个决定：制作一个具有情感的机器人。他的名字叫大卫（哈利·约尔·奥斯曼）——第一个被输入情感程序的机器男孩，作为一个试验品被该公司的员工（山姆·罗伯兹）和他的妻子（弗朗西斯·欧康娜）收养。他们自己的儿子因病被冷冻起来，直到能治疗这种病的方法出现。尽管大卫逐渐溶入这个家庭，但是，一系列意想不到的情况使得大卫对他现在的生活越来越无法忍受。
人类与机器都无法接受他，大卫开始了自己的旅行，寻找真正属于自己的地方……
热心网友
时间：2023-10-14 00:34
热心网友
时间：2023-10-14 00:33
华纳兄弟公司(Warner Brothers, USA)2001年出品
主演：
海利-乔-奥斯蒙特(Haley Joel Osment)
裘德-洛(Jude Law)
弗朗西斯-奥康娜(Frances O'Connor)
萨姆-罗伯兹(Sam Robards)
导演：斯蒂文-斯皮尔伯格(Steven Spielberg)
编剧：斯蒂文-斯皮尔伯格(Steven Spielberg)
类型：科幻片
热心网友
时间：2023-10-14 00:34
热心网友
时间：2023-10-14 00:33
很不错的片子,很喜欢.这部片子是斯皮尔伯格拍的,好像是他的一个朋友去世了,为了他拍的这部片子.这个小说就是他的那个朋友写的.
片中的那个男孩海利-乔-奥斯蒙特,演的很出色.
Jude law 演的机器舞男也有点意思...
热心网友
时间：2023-10-14 00:34
