求翻译，，，不要在线翻译的啊，翻译出来不通顺。。。 是大型碳氢燃料池火灾的物理特性。。

发布网友 发布时间：2022-05-30 03:23

我来回答

共2个回答

热心网友 时间：2023-09-29 15:03

追答It is known from field experiments concted with different liquid fuels that the burning characteristics and the physical behavior of pool fire changes as the size (diameter) of the fires increases (AGA [3], Raj et al. [8], Malvos and Raj [14], Mizner and Eyre [16]).
从使用不同液体燃料的野外试验我们知道，池火灾的燃烧特征和物理表现随着燃烧范围（直径）的增加而改变（参考资料[3],[8],[14],[16]）。

Therefore, extrapolation of the results (especially thermal radiation emissions) from small-scale experiments for predicting the characteristics of large size fires occurring in postulated accidental liquid fuel release scenarios (from terminal storage tanks, ships, barges and other large volume transports) is prone to significant errors unless a detailed turbulent diffusion fire model with proper combustion chemistry is used.
因此，从小规模的试验来外推假定发生的由液体燃料泄漏事件（例如终端储存罐、轮船、游艇以及其他大体积运输工具）引发的大规模火灾的特征结果（尤其是热辐射的释放量）倾向于明确的错误，除非同时使用一个使用恰当的燃烧剂的火焰混乱扩散细节模型。

Unfortunately, the current generation of models used by the scientific community and regulatory agencies in the US, for predicting hazard zones surrounding postulated large pool fires of liquefied natural gas (LNG) caused by large scale releases suffer from this problem (i.e., small scale experimental results are used, erroneously, for predicting large size fire effects).
很不幸，在现在的美国，科学界和管理机构使用的这一代模型，用于预测假定发生的大规模液化天然气（LNG）泄漏引发的大型池火灾周围的危险区域，仍然面临着这一问题（也就是说，通过进行小规模的实验来错误的预测大规模火灾的情况）。
{最后一句话死活看不懂啊}

The result is the prediction of overly conservative and alarmingly large hazard zones, which, needless to say, disturbs the public at large.
其结果是过于保守的又惊*范围的危险区域，不用说，这让大众十分担忧。

热心网友 时间：2023-09-29 15:03