发布网友 发布时间:2022-12-05 22:31
共2个回答
懂视网 时间:2023-01-27 20:31
编者按:雅思英语作文需要时刻注入新的范文,做好知识储备,才能迎接英语考试中的难题,英语作文的练习尤为重要,一起来看一看雅思英语作文范文吧。
Picture this. You have a job that pays okay. But you don’t really like it. Well, let me put it this way: You like the money, but you wouldn’t do that job if there was no money involved.
“Screw it, I need money to have a life!” You might think.
We all have bills to pay, people to take care of, and important tasks to complete. We do these things because if we don’t, we might get fired and lose our income.
And without income, we can’t pay for our house, clothes, vacations, etc.
I’m describing a “normal” life. I call this normal because this is how 99% of all people that I know live.
After years of living a normal life, you get the hang of it. You know what to say and do to keep your job. You also know what time you can wake up so you can barely make it on time to work.
I know because those thoughts went through my mind when I had a job I didn’t like. And every week, I’d set the alarm a little later. I was also ready to leave work when that clock hit 5PM on the dot.
Human beings are smart. We adapt quickly.
And that’s exactly our biggest problem. We easily get trapped into what I call the “excitement and acceptance cycle.” Most of my life went like this:
A new “thing” can be anything: A new job, goal, desire, relationship. You get excited about something, but after a while, you always get into an acceptance phase.
And that’s what I want to avoid because acceptance means stagnation, which means a lack of progress.
“Is stagnation bad?”
Most people probably don’t mind stagnation. They just fill up their life with pleasure and entertainment.
Who cares, right? Just accept where you are in life. Protect the status quo. Keep your job. Put in the minimum amount necessary to keep your business afloat. And just cruise.
You can easily go through life without personal growth. There’s nothing wrong with that.
But that doesn’t work for me, personally, for one reason: I think a life of only entertainment is useless.
But still, I’ve stagnated many times in life. And I’m sure I will stagnate again at some point. But here’s the thing: If you stay put for too long, your situation gets worse.
There’s no such thing as protecting the status quo. The famous actress and philanthropist, Helen Hayes, who was one of only 12 people who have won an Emmy, a Grammy, an Oscar and a Tony Award, said it best:
“If you rest, you rust.”
Those five words capture the essence of progress and why it matters. And if look at my own life, I can give you many examples to demonstrate that.
When I started my first business, I learned a lot during the first two years, but my growth stopped after that because I didn’t understand this concept. I just stopped pushing hard. Did I get tired? No, not really. I don’t know why I started taking things easy. It just happened.
Same is true for my blog. I’m now moving into my third year. But earlier this year, I kind of stopped coming up with new ideas and concepts. Again, I don’t know why. I guess it’s human nature.
But not for everyone. And fortunately, we can study other people and learn from them.
Progress is about moving forward. Success comes after that.
Take Kobe Bryant, one of the best basketball players of all time. For the past few years, I’ve been fascinated by his mindset. His obsession with practicing is unheard of.
He was always the first person in the gym and the last one out. In the summer 1999, when everybody was resting, Kobe was making 100,000 shots. Not taken. He made 100,000 shots during that summer. He made progress while most of his peers were not.
And in 2000, 2001, and 2003, he won championships with the Lakers. Coincidence? I don’t think so.
Kobe Bryant didn’t rest or stagnate. He could have easily thought: “I can just take 100,000 shots.” But instead, he strived for making them. Because that’s what mattered to him.
It’s about getting better every day and moving forward. It’s about progress. Look at it this way. What’s the other option? Sitting back in your beach chair? Giving up?
Accepting the “realities” of life? Screw that. If you want something, go after it.
To me, there is no other option. I’m not here to rest OR rust. I remind myself of that all the time.
So, onwards we go. Care to join me?
公众号:英语学习
本文为原创文章,版权归作者所有,未经授权不得转载!
热心网友 时间:2023-01-27 17:39
雅思写作task2参考范文
在一些国家,现在越来越多的人选择独居。你认为这个现象是好的.还是坏的?面是我整理的雅思英语作文,大家可以参考参考。
题目: In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
范文:
In recent years it has become far more normal for people to live alone, particularly in large cities in the developed world. In my opinion, this trend could have both positive and negative consequences in equal measure.
The rise in one-person households can be seen as positive for both personal and broader economic reasons. On an indivial level, people who choose to live alone may become more independent and self-reliant than those who live with family members. A young alt who lives alone, for example, will need to learn to cook, clean, pay bills and manage his or her budget, all of which are valuable life skills; an increase in the number of such indivials can certainly be seen as a positive development. From an economic perspective, the trend towards living alone will result in greater demand for housing. This is likely to benefit the construction instry, estate agents and a whole host of other companies that rely on homeowners to buy their procts or services.
However, the personal and economic arguments given above can be considered from the opposite angle. Firstly, rather than the positive feeling of increased independence, people who live alone may experience feelings of loneliness, isolation and worry. They miss out on the emotional support and daily conversation that family or flatmates can provide, and they must bear the weight of all household bills and responsibilities; in this sense, perhaps the trend towards living alone is a negative one. Secondly, from the financial point of view, a rise in demand for housing is likely to push up property prices and rents. While this may benefit some businesses, the general population, including those who live alone, will be faced with rising living costs.
In conclusion, the increase in one-person households will have both beneficial and detrimental effects on indivials and on the economy.
题目: Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
范文:
People have different views about how much choice students should have with regard to what they can study at university. While some argue that it would be better for students to be forced into certain key subject areas, I believe that everyone should be able to study the course of their choice.
There are various reasons why people believe that universities should only offer subjects that will be useful in the future. They may assert that university courses like medicine, engineering and information technology are more likely to be beneficial than certain art degrees. From a personal perspective, it can be argued that these courses provide more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries, and therefore an improved quality of life for students who take them. On the societal level, by forcing people to choose particular university subjects, governments can ensure that any knowledge and skill gaps in the economy are covered. Finally, a focus on technology in higher ecation could lead to new inventions, economic growth, and greater future prosperity.
In spite of these arguments, I believe that university students should be free to choose their preferred areas of study. In my opinion, society will benefit more if our students are passionate about what they are learning. Besides, nobody can really predict which areas of knowledge will be most useful to society in the future, and it may be that employers begin to value creative thinking skills above practical or technical skills. If this were the case, perhaps we would need more students of art, history and philosophy than of science or technology.
In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for universities to focus only on the most useful subjects, I personally prefer the current system in which people have the right to study whatever they like.
;