请各位帮忙翻译成英文,急急急!!～万分感谢

发布网友发布时间：2022-04-27 13:19

共1个回答

热心网友时间：2023-09-23 05:45

In recent years, anti-mping incidents were not uncommon in China. When Chinese furniture, broke into the U.S. market in recent years, same with other inexpensive Chinese goods, are also threatened by anti-mping, since the first voice of "anti-mping" policy at the end of 2002, the issues were mentioned again by the U.S. furniture instry in the mid-2003, and a clear timetable has put forward. Between 2000 and 2003, Chinese furniture exports to the United States has rapidly risen. Only wooden bedroom furniture alone had rapidly grew from the original less than $ 360 million to $ 1.2 billion, more than tripled in four years, accounting for 4% of U.S. market share. Lead to the U.S. furniture manufacturing enterprises proction to drop, and the sales fell 23%, operating profit decreased by 75%, and the instry cut 34,000 jobs, which accounting for 28% of the total number of employees. Therefore some manufacturers blamed the surge in China's furniture exports to the U.S for creating the difficulties.
December 10, 2003, the U.S. Department of Commerce through the support rate of 57% of Chinese furniture anti-mping case and made a decision bill. The U.S. Department of Commerce anti-mping investigation was originating in the Chinese wooden bedroom furniture. On January 9, 2004, the U.S. International Trade Commission made an affirmative determination by 6 to 0, finds that there are reasonable indications that because the horizontal wooden furniture from China was selling below the "fair value" in the U.S. market, the U.S. instry suffered by physical harm or beast like real serious harming threat. According to the preliminary results of the U.S. International Trade Commission, The U.S. Department of Commerce continues anti-mping investigation on furniture from China. In December 2004, the U.S. International Trade Commission final determination has added 8.64% weighted average tax rate levied on more than 100 Chinese enterprises, which were responding. And an implementation of 198.08% punitive tax rates on nearly 20,000 Chinese enterprises, which did not respond.